Barry finds his feet

Gareth Barry's long-awaited return to the England team was regarded by many observers as a galvanising factor for the two 3-0 successes against Israel and Russia in September.


Although the partnership between Emile Heskey and Michael Owen was lauded for providing the finishing touches, it was the dovetailing between the 26-year-old and Steven Gerrard in the centre of midfield which had critics purring.

"The point is your star players don't always make your star team," said former England manager Graham Taylor after the Russia match.

"You have to get the balance and the shape right and anyone can see the balance and shape Barry has given this side.

"Barry has had to wait for his chance. He played 27 times for the England Under-21s and never made that step into the full side but all along, he's had an inner conviction that he is good enough to play for his country."

That conviction was severely tested over the three-and-a-half years he spent in the international wilderness during Sven-Goran Eriksson's reign.

And what made it more galling for the Sussex-born player, is that it came at a time when England were struggling to find left-sided players.

Having made his debut as a 19-year-old against Ukraine in May 2000, Barry was called-up to the England squad by Kevin Keegan for the European Championship the same year.

But when it came to Sven-Goran Eriksson's first game in charge, Barry was relegated to the under-21s and featured only intermittently over the next six years.

Contrast that with another teenager who made his England debut the same day.

Steven Gerrard joined Barry at the Euros that summer but he went on to pick up 47 caps during Eriksson's tenure. In the same period Barry earned just seven.

"There were times when I thought I was not going to get back in again," Barry said.

"Three or four years have ticked by; you have not made a squad - and you start fearing the worst.

"Under Sven, I basically gave up hope. But I always felt I was playing well enough, that time was still on my side - and I just got my head down at Villa and kept going."

That approach eventually lead to Villa boss Martin O'Neill handing him the captaincy and last season shifting him into the middle of the park where he flourished.

So after spending years hoping for a call-up when England were devoid of a left-footed player, Barry perversely got a chance to re-unite with Gerrard in an area considered to be an embarrassment of riches.

The leading argument with Barry, however, was that he brought a completely new dynamic to England's midfield.

While Lampard has been on form for Chelsea over recent seasons, when he does not score, his role in the team has been questioned. And as a more direct player, he can be liable to misplace his passes.

Gareth Barry in action for England against Israel

Playing alongside Gerrard, Barry showed patience, an ability to link play simply and let the attacking players pour forward.

And the fact the pair have been firm friends since making their international debuts, adds an interesting footnote as to why they clicked.

Barry's biggest contribution may well be the pressure he has now put on England's central midfield positions.

But, despite his lack of international experience, he is quietly confident that he can hold his own.

"There is competition everywhere, and it is nice to put my name among the great players being talked about to start for their country," he said.

"It would be great to start - and it was nice to put in two good performances and be talked about for the way I played."

With Gerrard struggling for form and Lampard coming back from injury, it may be that McClaren has to choose between the attacking midfielders rather than cut Barry adrift once again.

(Courtesy: BBC)

Which idiot voted for Phil Neville?

The recently concluded online polls was quite surprising. Generally, the public was generally split and undecided on who occupy the other center midfield berth and partner Stevie G. 44% voted for Hargreaves while another 44% voted for Barry. When you think about it though, Hargreaves had proved himself during the World Cup, and Barry's recent endeavours in the 2 Euro 2008 qualifiers, perhaps it is not quite so surprising.

Personally, i believe Hargreaves should get the nod, because he has had more experience in top flight football ; German league, Champions League at his time with Bayern Munich. Also, he is more suited to playing the tough tackling anchor role, whereas Barry is more of a defensive playmaker type. When playing against top top teams, a defensive playmaker is a luxury England cannot afford.

However, the bigger question is, WHICH IDIOT VOTED FOR PHIL NEVILLE?

Maybe Phil voted for himself

Fortune favours the bold, eh McClown?

England 3 - Israel 0

Lets face it, Israel didn't even put up a fight. That begs the question though, was it down to England's dominating display, or did Israel just suck? I think its the latter. England will not find it so easy on Wednesday against Russia, who are a top side.

Nevertheless, McClown got a few things right in this game. As the saying goes, fortune favours the bold, and so fortune favoured McClown last night.

The inclusion of Heskey paid off handsomely, as he and Owen paired off as effectively as they did in their Liverpool days. Owen was comfortable, and afforded so much space and room to manouvere because of all the work that Heskey put in.

Barry and SWP show some love (Courtesy: ESPN Soccernet)

Gareth Barry's also revelled in the center midfield position next to Gerrard. Asked to play the playmaker/anchor role, he didn't look out of sorts on the big stage and provided the delicate through ball that slipped 3 Israeli players to arrive at the feet of Owen, who spun and scored a wonderful goal. However, come Wednesday, I suspect Owen Hargreaves may take his place back in the center midfield, as he well should be. Russia won't be as impotent in their attacks as Israel were.

England made full use of the flanks, with the Cole's rampaging down the left and SWP and M.Richards bombing down the right. A.Cole and M.Richards were in the Israeli half so many times, that they probably thought England had 4 wingers on the field. In essense, England really stretched the Israeli defence, and caused all sorts of mayhem.

So, few questions that still require answering, but only McClown and his circus will be able to answer it all:

• Should the primary center midfield position be Gerrard/Hargreaves, followed by Lampard/Barry?
  
• Should Micah Richards keep his place if Gary Neville is fit and available?
• Should Heskey be dropped when Crouch returns on Wednesday?
• Why does P.Neville still get international caps for England?